Head of AI & R&D at Exafuse · External PhD Researcher at Ruhr University Bochum

Laser-based manufacturing and industrial systems.

I'm a hands-on engineer with more than six years in Directed Energy Deposition / Laser Metal Deposition (DED/LMD) and a background in lasers and photonics. I work from deposition strategy and robotics to optical/process monitoring, control, documentation and quality—taking processes from “it works once” to repeatable, scalable production.

My work spans DED process development, sensing, machine integration, manufacturing data and R&D project leadership. Applied AI, numerical modelling and automation are engineering tools I use to make physical processes more robust, measurable and scalable.

Process & material

Domain
Laser metal deposition
Engineering
Deposition, sensing and control
Foundation
Lasers and photonics
Explore DED/LMD
Melt pool created during the laser metal deposition process.
Melt pool Created in the laser metal deposition process.

Engineering in use

From sensors to machine control

Monitoring and control deployed across three machines at two sites.

Personal engineering account
  • Evidence first Models propose. Evidence matters.
  • Human review Critical decisions require human review.
  • Traceability Recommendation context stays visible.
  • Provenance Sources stay attached to claims.
  • Trust boundary Decision-support is not approval.

Areas of work

Process depth. Connected systems. Technical responsibility.

Deep DED/LMD experience is the strongest proof of how I work. The same work connects lasers and photonics, practical sensing, industrial systems and project delivery.

Technical project & R&D leadership

Technical coordination, team leadership and manufacturing delivery. Led Exafuse's contribution to BreitbahnDED, including milestones, costs and reporting; managed five employees with hiring responsibility.

Lasers, photonics & sensing

M.Sc. Lasers and Photonics, alongside practical work in laser processing, cameras, optical sensing, illumination, calibration and process monitoring. Camera-based height sensing taken from concept to tested prototype.

Advanced manufacturing & industrial systems

More than six years in DED/LMD: deposition strategy, robotics, process control, machine integration, manufacturing data and automation. Also practical LPBF build preparation and troubleshooting, plus in-house MES/ERP and traceability.

My foundation is an M.Sc. in Lasers and Photonics at Ruhr University Bochum, with the Faculty Prize for best student, and a B.Tech. in Electrical Engineering.

Selected work

From process development to systems people use.

DED/LMD delivery: Duisburg bridge components

I led the monitoring and process-control work and coordinated delivery scheduling within my scope.

The monitoring/control work enabled unattended builds. Company and partner results remain separately attributed; testing was outside my role.

Read the project and my role

Monitoring and control across machines

I led the system architecture, development and integration, coordinating contributors working on sensors and algorithms.

Monitoring and control deployed across three machines at two sites. Each machine still requires its own calibration, commissioning and operating limits.

Inside the LMD control system

Camera-based height sensing

I developed camera-based height sensing from concept to tested prototype.

A tested prototype and an inspectable measurement workflow. The public case does not claim a certified accuracy or universal operating range.

Explore the optical sensing work

MES/ERP and operator workflows

I built the in-house MES/ERP and the operator procedures around it.

The workflow is used by every operator, giving process records a place in the history of each part.

Read about manufacturing records
Read the engineering context and my contribution

DED/LMD in practice

Monitoring and control for Duisburg bridge components.

Duisburg bridge components, 2024: led process monitoring and control work that enabled unattended builds and coordinated delivery scheduling within his scope. Testing was outside his role.

Read the project and my role
Large LMD-manufactured bridge node component from the Duisburg project
Exafuse — Duisburg bridge components Large structural LMD proof component from the Duisburg bridge story. View the Exafuse source

750+ kgDocumented components

6 nodesStructural nodes

219 hKnoten 10 build

Project scale from Exafuse's published record. My contribution is described separately; these figures are not personal output or engineering approval.

Research and method

Sense → Model → Decide → Verify

To me, a prediction is only one part of the job. The next action, the missing context, and the verification path have to be clear too.

  1. 01 Sense Capture the process signal and its operating context.
  2. 02 Model Make assumptions visible.
  3. 03 Decide Plan the evidence needed.
  4. 04 Verify Use inspection evidence.

The broader question behind the current work

I am studying how this approach can help with decisions based on incomplete physical signals, operational risk, and human responsibility. That is a research direction, not a cross-industry deployment claim.

  • Incomplete physical signals
  • High cost of false confidence
  • Model output connected to inspection
  • Operational context changes the recommendation
  • Human responsibility remains explicit
  • Traceability matters after the model runs

Research tools · Working decision product

See what the decision needs before asking for confidence.

The Cockpit keeps the decision signal, critical gaps, risk, evidence needed, and next action visible. Confidence is not approval.

Working example

Show the signal, the gaps, and the next action.

Example scenario: worn steel shaft near bearing seat.

Evidence-aware by design

Compact brief preview

LMD Decision Brief v1.0

Decision signal:

Screen with LMD Repairability Quick Check before expert review.

Brief completeness:

Ready for preliminary discussion

Expert-review package status:

Not ready

Evidence burden:

High inspection burden

Top 3 critical gaps:

  • Exact material grade
  • CAD/drawing
  • Damage depth

Top 3 risk flags:

  • Tight tolerance likely requires post-machining and dimensional inspection.
  • Unknown service conditions can change material compatibility and evidence needs.
  • CAD/drawing missing, so geometry recovery cannot be assessed yet.

Next action:

Prepare an Exafuse-ready review package with missing facts clearly marked.

Boundary:

Confidence is not approval.

Compact preview actions

Research platform

Methods, tools and technical notes

My industrial-AI research explores how physical signals, models and evidence support engineering decisions. Public company cases provide context; the tools make assumptions and limits visible.

Explore all frameworks

Authored note

One idea behind the broader platform

A first-person note on keeping model output, context, action, and verification connected.

Personal platform

Explore the method, current work, and research questions.

Engineering work in laser-based manufacturing, photonics and industrial systems, with DED/LMD evidence, technical notes and research tools.

Commercial boundary

For commercial LMD/DED services and RFQs, use Exafuse.

My current applied LMD/DED work is carried out through Exafuse. This site shares public methods and notes; company services, case studies, and engineering review belong there.

Engineering approach

Build the workflow around the physical process.

The process, measurement, machine interfaces and operator records need to work as one system. I connect these parts so a useful result on the shop floor can become a repeatable way of working.

More about my work

Applied AI and automation have a place in that workflow, alongside calibration, engineering judgement and physical verification.

Professional contact

Let's talk engineering.

Technical projects, R&D, laser-based manufacturing, photonics and sensing, or industrial systems.

Contact Manish
Manish Sharma / Laser-based manufacturing and industrial systems